If you must have your day in court, make it a good day

GlaxoSmithKline Asks Court To Dismiss Zofran Lawsuits

| Feb 19, 2016 | Uncategorized |

Manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline seeks early dismissal of hundreds of Zofran lawsuits.

Claiming insufficient evidence of a connection to increased risk of birth defects, Zofran manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) filed a motion on December 11, 2015 asking the Court to dismiss all failure-to warn Zofran lawsuits. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated all federally filed Zofran lawsuits in the District of Massachusetts in October 2015. The MDL has been underway only a short time, but already there are over 200 Zofran lawsuits pending there. GSK is taking action quickly in an effort to avoid litigation on their anti-nausea drug, which was initially approved in 1991 for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients going through surgery or cancer treatments. The FDA never cleared the drug for use in pregnant women, but GSK ran an aggressive advertising campaign that plaintiffs allege sought to to convince doctors and pregnant women that the drug was safe for the treatment of morning sickness. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) brought charges against the company for, among other things, their aggressive marketing of Zofran to pregnant women, which was illegal because the drug was never approved for that purpose. The company agreed to a fine of $3 billion in 2012. Judge Dennis Saylor was scheduled to review GSK’s motion to dismiss on January 14, 2016, during a status conference. According to their motion, the defendants ask the court to dismiss “all causes of action against it in this multidistrict litigation as preempted by federal law.” Defendant argues that there are no human studies specifically addressing the birth defect risk of taking Zofran during pregnancy. This, despite several studies that indicate a risk, including the following:

  • 2006: Scientists found that Zofran can cross the human placental barrier.
  • 2012: Researchers analyzed data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study on about 4,500 women, and found that treatments with drugs like Zofran were associated with a potential increased risk of cleft lip and palate.
  • 2013: Australian researchers, after evaluating pregnant women using Zofran, found a small increased risk of a major birth defect in those using it during the first trimester.
  • 2014: Researchers evaluated data from over 1,300 infants born to women who took Zofran during early pregnancy, and found a significant increased risk for cardiovascular defects.

The plaintiffs in the Zofran MDL, in their response dated January 5, 2016, assert that GSK’s motion to dismiss is “unripe, unprecedented and violates established federal law.” They add that because GSK never tried to gain FDA approval for Zofran’s use in pregnant women, and because discovery in this MDL hasn’t even started yet, the company still has “exclusive control of much of the evidence relevant to the foreseeable risks of Zofran use during pregnancy.” GSK’s motion is critically flawed, the plaintiffs state, and should be dismissed. Originally posted by Kendra Goldhirsch on LegalExaminer.com. Zofran Lawsuits – Ball & Bonholtzer Trial Attorney – Los Angeles

Archives

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

FindLaw Network