Study finds large share of medical malpractice claims linked to very small number of doctors.
Just one percent of physicians account for one third of paid medical malpractice claims, and these doctors have some distinctive traits in common, according to a Stanford study. “This problem of physicians who accumulate multiple claims and continue to practice … is a significant policy problem,” said lead author David Studdert, a professor of medicine and law at Stanford, “and one that we need to address.” In the study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers looked at more than 66,000 malpractice claims paid against 54,000 physicians nationwide between 2005 and 2014. Researchers focused on paid, rather than unpaid, claims, because that is a marker for substandard care. About one in three malpractice claims is ultimately paid. In the claims the researchers reviewed, one-third resulted in patient death and another 54 percent in serious injury. The study noted that only 6 percent of doctors had any paid claims over the 10-year period studied. The researchers said that the “claim-prone” physicians were disproportionately male (82 percent) and were older, rather than younger. More than half the claims were by doctors in one of four areas: internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery and general practice or family medicine. But the biggest predictor of all in the claim-prone doctors was whether they’d had a prior claim. “Compared to physicians with only one previous claim,” Studdert said, “a physician who has had three previous claims is three times as likely to have another one. A physician who has had four is four times more likely and so on.” In the study the researchers are clear that they have identified risk factors but that it is up to health care systems, hospital and malpractice insurers to identify and work with these doctors. But they noted that few of these organizations do. “With notable exception,” the researchers write, “fewer still systematically identify and intervene with practitioners who are at high risk for future claims.” They call for further investigation into predicting which doctors are at risk and then implementing interventions such as training and supervision to improve their quality of care. In California, patients can look up their doctor on the state’s medical board website. Depending on the type of malpractice settlement, it will be part of the public record if the doctor has had either three or four settlements within a five-year period. Other information is also available, including whether your doctor has had a felony conviction or is on probation. Patients can use the website simply to determine that a doctor’s license is valid. But advocates like Lisa McGiffert, with Consumers Union’s Safe Patient Project, say that’s not enough and have been pushing the Medical Board of California to require that doctors placed on probation notify their patients. The board has resisted taking this step. “This study is one more piece of information that regulators can use in determining their strategy in addressing the small percentage of doctors who have problems in their treatment of patients,” she said. A version of this story first appeared on KQED’s State of Health blog. Medical Malpractice Claims – Ball & Bonholtzer Trial Attorney – Los Angeles