If you must have your day in court, make it a good day

Traumatic Birth Brain Injury Lawsuit Prevented By Missed Statute Of Limitations

| Aug 20, 2015 | Uncategorized |

Mother claims hospital’s delay in performing cesarean section in high-risk pregnancy resulted in infant’s brain injury. Malpractice lawsuit can’t be filed as missing medical records caused statute of limitations to expire.

A medical malpractice lawsuit against a hospital where an infant suffered brain injury and other disabilities during a traumatic birth will not be permitted due to missed statute of limitations. Missing health records prevented the mother from obtaining information regarding the injuries for years. When the records finally appeared years after the child’s birth, Indiana statute of limitations prevented the mother from filing a botched delivery lawsuit against those responsible. The delivery in question occurred at IU Health Methodist Hospital on October 29, 2004. Prior to this date, the mother’s pregnancy had been classified as a high-risk pregnancy after her water broke at 24 weeks. The physician overseeing the mother’s care had also determined the baby was more than 10 pounds and a Cesarean delivery would be required to ensure a safe and healthy birth process. When the mother presented at Methodist, she told hospital staff to call her physician to come and perform the C-section. However, according to the mother, a midwife at the hospital refused to call her doctor. It was not until the fetal monitoring alarms began to go off that the midwife left the room to get help with the delivery. At that point, the mother claims the baby was stuck in the birth canal and deprived of oxygen. Upon delivery, the baby was silent and was taken away to the neonatal intensive care unit. The mother was also attended to, as extensive tearing during delivery left her with permanent damage. Today, the 10-year-old girl still has limited use of her arms, due to injuries suffered at her birth. She also suffers from short-term memory problems and a wandering eye. However, when school administrators tried to get medical records on the child to determine what her specific needs would be, hospital records were not available. Nearly 10 years after the child’s birth, her medical records were finally obtained by Wayne Township Schools. The records showed that the newborn suffered a brain injury, seizures, respiratory failure and hemorrhaging, due to her traumatic birth. With that information in hand, the mother of the injured child made the decision to file a malpractice lawsuit against UI Health Methodist. Unfortunately, the lawsuit was not valid, since the timing for the filing exceeded the statute of limitation on medical malpractice in Indiana. The state puts a limit of two years on individual lawsuits and six years to file on behalf of an injured child. Because it took nearly 10 years to obtain copies of the child’s medical records, the statute of limitation had already passed. Sadly, this is not the only claim of brain injury at birth attributed to this hospital system in recent years. Attorneys are representing four other mothers claiming malpractice during delivery led to their children’s injuries. Another lawsuit was filed against HealthNet, the healthcare system to which UI Health Methodist belongs, by a former director of women’s services for HealthNet, Dr. Judith Robinson. Dr. Robinson went public with concerns that the hospital system was allowing midwives to handle high-risk pregnancies that should have been managed by actual physicians. After the deliveries, physicians would sign off on the patient records to ensure they would receive full payment for services. According to Robinson, the health system benefited financially from this arrangement, since midwives typically charge less for their services than physicians. The federal lawsuit filed by Robinson alleges lack of physician involvement contributed to serious birth injuries, including permanent brain damage, and the death of one mother. Originally posted by Whitney Taylor on the online version of Injury Lawyer News. Ball & Bonholtzer Trial Attorney – Los Angeles – Brain Injury

Archives

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

FindLaw Network