If you must have your day in court, make it a good day

Class Action Suit Doesn’t Need A Primary Violator

| Dec 3, 2013 | Uncategorized |

There are other options for a class action suit beyond focusing on the primary violator.

Failure to name primary violator doesn’t doom class action against secondary actors

November 22 2013, Kieth Paul Bishop, lexology.com

One might expect plaintiffs to always name the primary violator in a securities fraud suit. However, what if suing the primary violator is not an option because the primary violator is in bankruptcy or the subject of a court ordered stay? Can there be a finding of secondary liability when there is no finding of primary liability?

U.S. District Court Judge 

Jon S. Tigar recently ruled that a plaintiff can proceed without the primary violator. In Hayden v. Wang, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161892 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013) the plaintiff, an investor in a private placement, filed a class action in California Superior Court against the issuer, the placement agent and numerous individuals alleging violations of Corporations Code Section 25401. After the action was filed, the issuer filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, thereby staying the action against it. The placement agent then removed the case to the federal court. The plaintiff then moved to sever the issuer and remand the claims back to the Superior Court. Three of the individual defendants argued that the action couldn’t proceed without the primary violator – the issuer.

Judge Tigar rejected this argument, stating:

The law is clear that the alleged primary violator is not required to be named as a defendant for a plaintiff to proceed against other defendants who are jointly and severally liable, or, with respect to [Corporations Code] section 25504.1, directly liable for materially assisting the primary violation.

Archives

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

testimonial-arrow

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

FindLaw Network