If you must have your day in court, make it a good day

$30 Million Awarded To Family Of Boy Disabled For Life After Dozens Of Surgeries

On Behalf of | Feb 25, 2016 | Uncategorized |

Family of boy disabled for life following more than two dozen surgeries awarded $30 million in medical malpractice case.

In a settlement reached with the hospital and doctor allegedly responsible for his injuries, the family of a young boy permanently disabled following 25 surgeries that failed to connect his esophagus to his stomach will receive over $30 million. On Feb. 18, Cook County Judge Edward S. Harmening, saying the two sides had reached a settlement resolving the case, dismissed the medical malpractice action brought in 2013 by plaintiffs Ethel and Oscar Chavez, parents of a child identified in the complaint as E.C., against defendants including pediatric surgeon Mark J. Holterman and Rush University Medical Center in Chicago. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed in court documents. However, in a news release, attorneys from the Chicago medical malpractice law firm of Romanucci & Blandin, who represented the Chavez family, said the family was awarded $30 million dollars. Neither the release nor the court documents indicated how much the Chavez family’s lawyers, including Stephan Blandin, would receive from the settlement. According to the release, E.C. was born in November 2009 with a “non-life threatening, easily correctable” congenital condition known as esophageal artresia, a condition in which the esophagus does not connect properly to the stomach. However, the release said, on the day after E.C.’s birth, Holterman “failed to exercise due care” when performing the surgery that would typically correct the problem, causing more problems that eventually led to two dozen “experimental procedures” on the child which Romanucci & Blandin said “were not authorized by the hospital and not pursuant to clinical trial protocol.” During the final surgery, however, the release from Romanucci & Blandin said E.C.’s pulmonary artery was severed as the result of “an inappropriate, off-label use of an endoclose needle,” which left E.C. disabled for life, with “profound, irreversible brain injury and cerebral palsy.” In the release, Blandin said Holterman’s actions in the child’s case were “medically careless and personally irresponsible,” as they “repeatedly exposed this young boy to the hazards of surgery and risky, novel operations.” Blandin further said the case indicated “a dramatic lack of oversight” on the part of Rush University Medical Center. The order from the judge instructed the parties specifically to not discuss Rush’s participation in the settlement “in any statements or writings.” According to the Romanucci & Blandin release, the award for the Chavez family marked the fourth largest medical malpractice award for a minor in Illinois, and the largest settlement for a child born with esophageal artresia in the state. Originally posted by Jonathan Bilyk on CookCountyRecord.com.   Disabled For Life – Ball & Evans & Ball & Evans Trial Attorney – Los Angeles

Archives

See What Other Clients Say

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

See What Other Clients Say

He actually persuaded me not to settle because he believed that we had a great case. So we took the case to trial and he fought like crazy for me. And we won! It was a really good experience —well, as much as it can be for a lawsuit — and I’m very happy I went with them. I’ve been really blessed to have him as my attorney, so I recommend him whenever I can.”

— Yelp.com review by Daniel M.

FindLaw Network